Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (Procedural) (non-admin closure)- Nomination was confusing, making it impossible to give an informed !vote. Comments by Mrschimpf are valid, and the nominator should take care when they are formatting any future Article for Deletion discussion. Exemplo347 (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We have been through various AfDs related to episode lists of Indian TV shows and many Indian TV shows just don’t fit in the format to maintain such episodic lists. These lists are purely unencyclopaedic, LISTCRUFTs and usually maintained and created by promotional newbies who dedicatedly edit only articles related to particular shows. Have tried boldly redirecting it two times but that clearly isn’t working as some IP insists on keeping it. Suggest deletion and salting. Also presenting previous similar AfDs.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yeh Hai Aashiqui episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jai Jai Jai Bajrang Bali episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jai Jai Jai Bajrang Bali episodes (Episode 1-1085)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jai Jai Jai Bajrang Bali episodes (Episode 1086-1300)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Just Mohabbat episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Son Pari episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Adaalat episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Adaalat episodes (2nd nomination)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CID episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tehkikaat episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ishaan episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sanya episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kartika episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Navya episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kya Mast Hai Life episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Episodes
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy Nights Bachao Episode List
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Procedural Keep This nomination is entirely confusing in structure; you look at the 'list of's presented thinking they're bundled nominations, but they're expired nominations, trying to muddle the pool towards a delete by throwing random nominations out that are merely related by airing on Indian television. That's not how this works. Meanwhile on the actual topic of the AfD I'm seeing something sourced by multiple different sources and a lot of WP:BITEing by the nominator just for the sole reason of them being "promotional newbies", which immediately bends me towards an automatic keep (especially based on your previous history of weak-reasoned AfD's regarding Indian television topics). Clean up this nom, don't attack other editors (no matter if they have 1 or 100,000 edits) and use the proper way of presenting it; as it is this is just a solution looking for a problem (and use other avenues like WP:RFP before coming to AfD). Nate • (chatter) 05:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- A bundle nomination will have articles listed, not AfDs. The things that are nominated for deletion are listed in bundle nominations. Why the hell will I request to delete AFD discussion pages!?! "Also presenting previous similar AfDs." Does this line make sense? If being sourced was the only criteria for having articles, we never would need Notability essays. The AfD should not be closed just for the sake of your poor grasp of understanding the nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- On first glance, they do look like bundled nominations. An editor shouldn't have to click on them to determine if they're old, and I've been here a long time; I've never seen this structure used to defend a nomination. I completely understand the nomination, but find it to be completely malformed and misleading. Nate • (chatter) 05:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- You are not supposed to jump to conclusions after first glance anyways. An editor should in fact click on them and study them before hitting keyboard; especially if they have no know-how of what topic they are going to speak about. As you yourself said, if edit-count shouldn't matter, your duration here shouldn't either. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- On first glance, they do look like bundled nominations. An editor shouldn't have to click on them to determine if they're old, and I've been here a long time; I've never seen this structure used to defend a nomination. I completely understand the nomination, but find it to be completely malformed and misleading. Nate • (chatter) 05:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- A bundle nomination will have articles listed, not AfDs. The things that are nominated for deletion are listed in bundle nominations. Why the hell will I request to delete AFD discussion pages!?! "Also presenting previous similar AfDs." Does this line make sense? If being sourced was the only criteria for having articles, we never would need Notability essays. The AfD should not be closed just for the sake of your poor grasp of understanding the nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.